Reconfiguring Professional Inequality: Organizational Identity and Stratification in the Nigerian Accounting Profession

Taiwo A. Muritala

doi:10.53639/ijssr.v7i1.397

Authors

Taiwo A. Muritala Walter Sisulu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v7i1.397

Keywords:

Organizational Identity, Professional Inequality, Meritocracy, Accounting Profession, Nigeria

Abstract

This study critically examines how organizational identity, meritocratic evaluation, and commercialization intersect to reproduce professional inequality within the Nigerian accounting profession. Employing a qualitative research design, it draws on document analysis and in-depth interviews with accounting professionals across diverse firms. Thematic analysis identifies four interrelated mechanisms. First, a dominant discourse of neutrality and technical objectivity obscures underlying power relations within the profession. Second, merit-based evaluation systems privilege elite educational credentials and embedded social capital, thereby reinforcing stratified access to career advancement. Third, intensifying commercialization pressures prioritize revenue generation and client acquisition, reshaping professional norms and performance expectations. Fourth, discursive strategies are mobilized to legitimize and normalize exclusionary outcomes. The findings demonstrate that organizational identity functions not merely as a symbolic construct but as a material and institutional mechanism structuring access to opportunities, recognition, and rewards. While meritocracy and market-oriented logics are framed as neutral and efficiency-driven, they operate in practice as instruments that reproduce structural inequalities. This study contributes to critical debates on professional stratification and institutional power, and calls for targeted interventions by policymakers and professional bodies to balance market imperatives with inclusion, thereby fostering more equitable career progression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7). JAI Press.

Alejandro, A., & Zhao, L. (2024). Multi-method qualitative text and discourse analysis: A methodological framework. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(6), 1–15.

Ala-Heikkilä, V., Lämsä, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2024). Management accountants – a gendered image. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99, Article 102724.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Amis, J. M., Mair, J., & Munir, K. A. (2020). The organizational reproduction of inequality. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 1–36.

Anderson-Gough, F., Edgley, C., Robson, K., & Sharma, N. (2024). Diversity and the evaluation of talent in the accounting profession: The enigma of merit. Accounting Horizons, 38(1), 27–37.

Annisette, M., & Prasad, A. (2017). Critical accounting research in hyper-racial times. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 5–19.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Christensen, R. C., & Seabrooke, L. (2022). The big four under pressure: Scanning work in transnational fields. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2941–2969.

Dermarkar, S., & Hazgui, M. (2022). How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 83.

Guo, K. (2016). The institutionalization of commercialism in the accounting profession: An identity-experimentation perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 99–117.

Harber, M., & Willows, G. (2022). The commercialist identity of mid-tier firm auditors: A precarious balancing of priorities. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). SAGE Publications.

Lewis, A. (2016). A critical race theory discussion of neutrality and colorblindness in accounting. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 19, 113–134.

McNicholas, P., & Barrett, M. (2005). Answering the emancipatory call: An emerging research approach “on the margins” of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(4), 391–414.

Ran, B., & Golden, T. J. (2011). Who are we? The social construction of organizational identity through sense-exchanging. Administration & Society, 43(4), 417–445.

Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851.

Twyford, E. J., Tanima, F. A., & George, S. (2022). Critical race theory, counter-accounting, and the emancipatory potential of counter-stories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 330–358.